Layer 3 in Ethereum Network

Recent Heat of Debate lies in Layer 3 in Ethereum Network

Here’s a breakdown of the layers for context:

• Layer 1 is the base layer, which in this context is the Ethereum blockchain itself. It handles the fundamental operations and security of the network. However, as seen with Ethereum and other blockchain networks, Layer 1 can struggle with scalability, leading to high transaction fees and slower processing times during peak periods.

• Layer 2 solutions are built on top of Layer 1 to address these scalability issues without compromising the network’s security. They include mechanisms like rollups (Optimistic and ZK-Rollups), state channels, sidechains, and plasma. These solutions process transactions off the main Ethereum chain (off-chain) and then record them on Layer 1, significantly increasing transaction throughput and reducing costs.

• Layer 3 aims to take scalability, interoperability, and functionality further than Layer 2. It is envisioned as a layer that provides specialized solutions which might include cross-chain interoperability for seamless asset transfer across different Layer 1 or Layer 2 networks, microtransaction channels for extremely high volumes of small transactions, privacy features, and more complex smart contract operations that are cumbersome or inefficient on Layer 2.

Layer 3 solutions in the Ethereum network have recently become a topic of debate among industry leaders, with concerns emerging about their necessity, value, and impact on Ethereum’s security and economic sustainability.

In the nuanced world of Ethereum, the concept of “Layer 3” isn’t as universally defined or recognized as Layer 1 (the base Ethereum protocol) and Layer 2 (scaling solutions built on top of Ethereum, like Optimism or Arbitrum). However, the story of Layer 3 begins in a future where the demand for Ethereum’s capabilities has grown exponentially, fueling a need for more innovative, scalable, and flexible solutions.

Our tale unfolds in a bustling digital metropolis, within the core of the Ethereum network. This network, known for its decentralization and security, thrives as the backbone of countless applications, from finance to gaming. As Ethereum’s applications burgeon, so do the challenges — scalability constraints and rising transaction costs threaten to stifle innovation.

Enter the ingeniously conceived Layer 3, a conceptual framework birthed from the minds of the most brilliant developers in the Ethereum community. This layer is not a single technology but a mosaic of solutions designed to operate atop Layer 2 scaling solutions, offering even greater scalability, privacy, and interoperability.

Among these solutions, one stands out — an innovative platform known as “Traverse,” built as a Layer 3 on the Ethereum Network. Traverse is designed to act as a cross-chain protocol that enables seamless interaction between various Layer 2 solutions and other blockchain networks. This capability ensures users can transact and communicate across different ecosystems with minimal fees and latency.

The creation of Traverse sparks a revolution. Developers across the globe begin constructing a new breed of decentralized applications (dApps) that leverage the unique capabilities of Layer 3. These dApps are not only faster and cheaper to use but also possess the ability to operate across multiple chains, breaking down the barriers that once limited the scope of decentralized technologies.

One of the most groundbreaking applications born from this innovation is “Ethereal,” a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that orchestrates a decentralized digital economy. Ethereal enables users to create, trade, and monetize assets and services across multiple blockchain networks, powered by the interoperable nature of Traverse. This DAO becomes a hub for digital innovation, fostering an economic system where participants govern themselves without centralized authorities.

As Layer 3 solutions like Traverse gain momentum, the Ethereum community witnesses a dramatic reduction in network congestion and transaction fees. This improvement brings forth a new era of blockchain accessibility, where users from all corners of the globe can participate in the digital economy without the prohibitive costs that once barred entry.

Throughout this journey, Layer 3 faces its share of challenges. Technical hurdles, governance debates, and the constant threat of cyber-attacks test the resilience of Layer 3 solutions. Nevertheless, the community’s unwavering commitment to innovation and inclusivity ensures that each obstacle is met with a solution, gradually forging a more robust and versatile Ethereum network.

In this digital renascence, Ethereum transcends its original form. It evolves into a multilayered ecosystem where Layer 1 provides security and decentralization, Layer 2 enhances scalability, and Layer 3 offers unprecedented levels of interoperability and efficiency. This new structure supports a diverse array of applications, from global financial systems to decentralized social networks, marking the dawn of a new chapter in the blockchain saga.

Layer 3 on the Ethereum network, and more broadly in blockchain terminology, refers to a conceptual framework or infrastructure layer that builds on top of Layer 2 scaling solutions. While still largely theoretical or in early development stages, the purpose of Layer 3 is to provide specialized solutions that enhance scalability, interoperability, and functionality beyond what Layer 2 solutions can offer. Thus, Layer 3 in the Ethereum network emerges not merely as a technological advancement but as a symbol of the blockchain community’s relentless pursuit of a decentralized, efficient, and inclusive future.

An example use case for Layer 3 could be a specific gaming or social networking application that requires high throughput of microtransactions, interoperability with multiple assets across different chains, and customized privacy options. Instead of overloading a Layer 2 solution with these specialized needs, a Layer 3 solution could be developed to efficiently handle them, leveraging the security and liquidity of Layer 1 and the scalability of Layer 2.

Layer 3 solutions in blockchain technology aim to further enhance scalability, interoperability, and specialized application capabilities on top of Layer 2 solutions. As such, they could serve a variety of innovative and sophisticated use cases that require high-throughput, cross-chain operability, or complex functionalities that Layer 1 or Layer 2 might not efficiently support. Here are some potential use cases for Layer 3 solutions:

1. Cross-Chain DeFi Platforms: Layer 3 can enable seamless interoperability between different blockchains, allowing users to effortlessly interact with DeFi (Decentralized Finance) protocols across multiple networks. This could lead to more efficient capital utilization, broader asset diversity, and enhanced liquidity pools.

2. Microtransaction Networks: For ecosystems requiring a high volume of small transactions, such as in-game currencies, content micropayments, or IoT device interactions, Layer 3 could provide the necessary throughput and efficiency. This layer could handle these microtransactions off the main chain, ensuring low fees and fast processing, and then periodically settle on Layer 2 or Layer 1.

3. Privacy Solutions: Layer 3 could offer advanced privacy-preserving technologies tailor-made for specific applications. For instance, a privacy-centric messaging app or a confidential voting system could use Layer 3 to ensure end-to-end encryption and anonymity while leveraging the security and decentralization of the underlying blockchain layers.

4. Identity and Reputation Systems: By building on Layer 3, developers can create complex identity verification and reputation management systems that operate across different blockchains. These systems could be used for secure digital identity, trustless credit scoring, and more, benefiting sectors like finance, ecommerce, and social networking.

5. Customized Smart Contracts for Niche Markets: Layer 3 could support the development of highly specialized smart contracts tailored for niche industries or unique business models, providing functionalities that are too resource-intensive or specific to be efficiently run on Layer 2. Examples include intricate supply chain tracking systems, specialized insurance products, or customized DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) governance models.

6. AI and Data Analysis: For applications that require blockchain for data integrity but also need heavy computation for AI and data analysis, Layer 3 could offload these computationally intensive tasks. This setup allows the maintaining of data integrity and trust on the blockchain while enabling complex computations to be done more efficiently.

7. Interoperable Gaming and Metaverse Platforms: Layer 3 can facilitate the creation of cross-chain gaming experiences and metaverse interactions, where assets, identities, and achievements can seamlessly move between different blockchain-based games or virtual worlds.

As the blockchain ecosystem evolves, the need for such specialized solutions will likely increase, driving the development and adoption of Layer 3 technologies. However, it’s essential to note that as of early 2023, the practical implementation of Layer 3 solutions is still largely conceptual and may require further technological innovations and ecosystem development to be fully realized.

Polygon Labs CEO Marc Boiron has criticized Layer 3 networks, arguing that they could potentially devalue Ethereum by diverting value away from it towards Layer 2 solutions. He expressed concerns that consolidating all Layer 3 solutions onto a single Layer 2 could diminish Ethereum’s value and threaten its economic sustainability. Boiron also highlighted the potential risk to Ethereum’s security if all L3s settled on a single L2, as it would decrease Ethereum’s value capture and jeopardize its economic sustainability. He suggested that this scenario could lead validators to lose confidence in ETH, resulting in a decline in network security as validators withdraw from securing the network.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin also shared his views, stating that Layer 3 solutions do not inherently enhance throughput to a significant degree. He pointed out that they can help mitigate certain fixed costs associated with batch publishing and deposits/withdrawals but emphasized that their primary focus is not on achieving “scalability squared.” Buterin’s comments align with the understanding that Layer 3 solutions should be designed to address specific functional needs of different use cases rather than general scaling purposes.

These concerns highlight the potential challenges and trade-offs associated with implementing Layer 3 solutions within the Ethereum ecosystem. They underscore the importance of carefully considering the impact of new technologies on the security, value, and sustainability of the network.

Disclaimer：

1. This article is reprinted from [medium], Forward the Original Title‘Toward Multidimensional Solana Fees’, All copyrights belong to the original author [Jayjit Biswas]. If there are objections to this reprint, please contact the Gate Learn team, and they will handle it promptly.

2. Liability Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not constitute any investment advice.

3. Translations of the article into other languages are done by the Gate Learn team. Unless mentioned, copying, distributing, or plagiarizing the translated articles is prohibited.